

The collective-action problem can be overcome through the provision of selective benefits that is, benefits that are conferred only on those who join the group and contribute to the collective good. Large and heterogeneous groups, for example, have a more difficult time overcoming the collective-action problem than do small groups based on narrow, specific interests. It is also important to note that the collective-action problem falls disproportionately on some groups. Of course, if this is everyone’s incentive, then the puzzle is: Why does anyone contribute to the common good? The Collective-Action Principle: all politics is collective action and, whereas all cooperation through collective action is difficult, the difficulty mounts as the number of people grows.Īccording to Mancur Olson’s The Logic of Collective Action, the main impediment to collective action in interest groups is the fact that every individual has an incentive to be a “free rider,” reaping the common benefits that result from the contributions of others. 34–35).Įxamining the Collective-Action Principle Schattschneider claimed that affluent interests benefit from the organization of politics in groups he famously observed that “the flaw in the pluralist heaven is that the heavenly chorus sings with a strong upper class accent” (pp. In The Semisovereign People, political scientist E.

Generally speaking, any collective interest can form and participate in the pluralist group universe.
